Website Profile: Jims59.com

Here's a place to spend your coffee break. Or maybe an entire afternoon! Jims59.com outlines - in tremendous detail - the restoration of a low-mile `59 Impala that had been stored for 35 years. The restoration photos include many shots of the car in various states of assembly; Jim also discusses methodically what type of work needed to be done to each corner and each panel. The car was so nice that he ended up only repainting the blue portion of the car; the white paint was perfect. This section of the website can be used by `59 enthusiast to see exactly what their own `59 might look like underneath the grit and grime. This car is beautiful!

Aside from the restoration, Jims59.com also provides some vintage photos of `59s going back 25+ years. Also a nice feature to the site is his section on Vintage Schwinn Bicycles. Make sure to stop by his site today and check it out!

KDC

The Practice Classic

Recently I got an email from a younger car lover looking for help. "Just wondering if you'd lend a helping hand and push me in the right direction," is what he wrote.

"I have always loved every bit of detail and beauty in the '59 Chevrolet Impala. I'm not much of a car buff or car maniac, but when it comes to the '59 you could talk to me for days and I wouldn't lose interest. ...After a while I would definitely love (and plan to) buy and restore a '59 Though I've still got plenty of time before this happens...In the meantime I'd like to study up on car restoration and anything else that could help. ...I'd like to ask for any words of wisdom, advice, tips, or resources (besides your site haha). I'm somewhat of a beginner when it comes to cars as I have only done minor checks and replacements (brakes pads, rotors...) so any suggestion will be well accepted."

Well I can't blame him for liking the `59. It's one of a kind. His email led me to believe that maybe some folks should consider buying what I call "The Practice Classic." A car from the 1960s would be a good place to start in your training towards restoring a `59. Some are more forgiving than others - six-cylinder cars and four doors - because they're often not totally trashed even at 40+ years old. Having a driver like that gives people the opportunity to polish up on old-school maintenance skills - tune ups, water pump replacement, front end rebuild etc. - and maybe even a bit of body work. It allows people to cut their teeth on an old car for which the parts are plentiful and simple to replace; this can help you later, as the car projects become more complicated (and they will...believe me). Good candidates for a Practice Classic would be any Slant-Six powered Chrysler product from the Sixties, or even a a 1967 Cadillac Sedan Deville.

Searching for a `59 Chevy currently is fairly easy, although with each passing year it becomes tougher to find good ones that aren't expensive or beat up. Craigslist is a good source, as well as Collector Car Trader. Hemmings Motor News also has comprehensive nationally-based classifieds. One of my Biscayne's suspension parts came from Montana, thanks to Hemmings. If a person doesn't have an affinity to four-doors, a Practice Classic like the `59 Chev four-door sedan is also cost-effective and usually in better shape. Biscaynes and Bel Airs can still be found functional in the mid four-digit range, with non-running projects costing quite a bit less (beware of RUST...it's deadly on `59s and took most of them out by the end of the 1960s. It's a miracle there are any left today). Hardtops? They are getting out of the grasp of regular folks in my opinion, even the four-door hardtop "Sports Sedans" are getting pricey. The project cars are out there, and most need a lot of love. And Convertibles? Yes, they exist for a price or a project; scrap ones now start in the five-digits, and I've seen some so rusty that they're falling in on themselves from rot. Funny development for a car one could barely give away in 1980.

My thought is that a `59 four door is a good "way in" to your dream. A person's relationship with a car like that can become lifelong if it proves to be dependable and fun; or it can function as a "filler `59" until such time that the desired model is found. Either way, it's hard to go wrong with a car that is getting more and more popular on the street as the years go on.

Repairing The `59 Driveline

The `59 driveline is a two-piece affair (front and rear shafts) and a carrier bearing in between.


The carrier bearing attaches to the inside of the "X-Frame Tunnel" between the trans and the differential. If you crawl underneath you'll see what I mean; the driveline runs through the frame in that spot. The carrier bearing often fails in one place, right where it attaches to the frame. When it fails the driveline flails around like a big floppy fish when you gun it. This is a common problem with all X-Frame Cars (1958 to 1964), and the carrier bearing is common part to order from your local parts store.

To remove the driveline, first back the rear wheels up onto a pair of ramps and set the parking brake. Block the front wheels once the brake is set, and then put the car in Neutral (I'll explain later). Look for two bolt heads on the underside of the X-Frame; these are the two bolts holding the carrier bearing inside the tunnel, and the holes through which they pass are slotted for adjustment. Remove these bolts completely. In addition, four bolts hold the rear universal joint in the differential yolk. Remove them and pry lightly forward on the driveline to unseat the u-joint from the yolk. Once it's free, just pull slowly on the driveline to remove it from the tunnel. When it's on the ground, look at the attachment point for the carrier bearing (it's upside down "T" with two bolt holes). Chances are the metal around the base is broken or torn (see picture). It's a weak point that has been addressed by the aftermarket, with the use of a billet aluminum support and replaceable bearing. These are available through periodicals like Lowrider Magazine, and are for specialized applications like hoppers or cars equipped with hydraulics. For most purposes however, a trip to your parts store will get you a carrier bearing with a support made of mild steel; this will likely last for many years and is not an expensive item.


Now the tough part. Because this driveline is an intricate press-fit deal, it's best to simply give the whole assembly -- along with your newfound carrier bearing -- to a machine shop and have them do the installation. While they're at it, have them install 3 new u-joints (also a very common Chevy part); that way your driveline is fresh and ready for battle. When you get it back, reverse the process to put it back into the car. At the front, turn the driveline with your hand to line it up with the back of the transmission and then insert the yolk. Since the transmission is in neutral, you can then spin the driveline to line up with the differential yolk. Fresh bolts on the differential yolk and the carrier bearing are also a good idea, since the ones on the car may be circa 1959.

A few years ago I created a PDF on Repairing the `59 Chevy Driveline. It lays out all the necessary tools and procedures involved in working on this important part of the car. Feel free to download this process and try the job yourself. It's not that hard...once you have done it several times ;-) I've done enough of these drivelines to know that they can be a weak spot for the car if left unserviced. It's usually the first thing I do without question when purchasing an X-Frame car. So make sure to grease the front & rear u-joints often, and try to service the one inside the X-Frame at least once per year. If you do that, you'll be driving your `59 till 2059!

Kurt Clark

Originally written October 13, 2001 Edited and updated for this blog

Exhaust, the X-Frame, and You

Before pursuing a hard core exhaust project on the `59 Chevy, it's important to get the big picture and figure out exactly how to accomplish the job. It's not a simple deal using aftermarket stuff. On the contrary, the `58 to `64 Chevrolet requires some finesse in creating an exhaust system that works correctly. It's all about the X-Frame design. Allow me to explain...

One nagging problem I got with Big Daddy was the exhaust; the car had been drag raced for a number years and still had the big-tube racing headers installed. They did a great job breathing, but the shear size and length of the tubes caused multiple problems. Underhood heat was high, undercar clearance minimal, and oil drainplug access was sacrificed. In fact, the drainplug couldn't be removed completely because of a header tube running right in front of the hole!

After working with and around these things for a while, I decided that installing a more factory-type exhaust was the only way I would have a better system. Full size headers wouldn't work well on this car, as it sits 2" lower than stock. The simple act of carrying a passenger has the car scuffing the tarmac all day long. I considered stashing the Big Block in a corner and installing an L-82 350 - that thought lasted all of 10 minutes, because I LOVE Big Block motors and will probably always have one in this car. I considered Block Hugger headers, which have become popular with the Street Rod crowd; these would have been ideal for this application, given their ability to pass pipe in the smallest of places and close to the engine block. They also have an exit point that is closer to the stock small block manifolds that would have been available on the car. But when someone offered me a pair of 454 exhaust manifolds for FREE, I snapped them up and went stock instead.

The manifolds I got were from a `71 454 Caprice. Luckily they were "oval port" just like the heads on my `72 402. The collector was all the way towards the back of the manifold, closer to the firewall than the front of the car. If you've ever seen a "ram horn" off a small block, you'll understand that the collector drops straight down the middle of the manifold below the 2 middle exhaust ports. The 454 manifolds exit at the back of the engine, so the point where the exhaust system would begin is not advantageous.

Why is this a problem? Frame clearance primarily. Things aren't always easy with cars that sit on X-Frames. Rather than having parallel rails (which the exhaust would between), the X-Frame meets in the middle and has space for the driveline to run through. Because of the path of the rail toward that middle point, the exhaust system has to make a very tight 180 degree turn from the inside of the rail to the outside. This is accomplished with exhaust pipe that measures 2 1/4" OD or less. I am told that, if a person tries to bend a bigger OD pipe at this tight angle, the result will be a pinched pipe. Another bottleneck is the rear frame area where, according to a veteran exhaust builder, there is only enough room to run 2" OD pipe past the differential. Bottom line is that these cars were not built to run contemporary Big Block Exhaust!

So for me the resulting exhaust is described as follows:

1. 454 Exhaust Manifolds w/2 1/2" collectors
2. 2 1/4" aluminized pipe, turned 180 degrees from inside of frame rail to outside
3. 2 1/2" aluminized pipe, following contour of rail on the outside of frame
4. 24" Cherry Bomb glasspaks, 2 1/2" OD
5. 2 1/2" aluminized pipe, exiting in front of rear wheels
6. 3" aluminized tailpipes, angle cut NASCAR style

The sound is deep and mellow. The exhaust is toned well inside the car at freeway speeds, and cannot be heard by someone even two car lengths away with the windows up. I have seen underhood temperatures drop, and my neighbors are happier now when I fire it up in the morning. I initially experienced a drop in gas mileage, but attributed that to the inefficient nature of the factory exhaust manifold design. Turns out my carburetor on the way out and I got the mpg back when I switched to a fresh carb.

Small block cars are much easier to configure, because the stock path can be utilized stem to stern; Miss Ruby, our `59 Impala, had 2" factory exhaust, quiet factory mufflers, and factory routing all the way out the back. The 350 breathed just fine with this system.

Kurt Clark

Originally written October 02, 2001 Edited and updated for this blog